Thursday, July 17, 2014

Tony Fung: the “Bad Boy of the stockmarket”

The following article was written by the Tourism News:

http://www.thetourismnews.com.au/tony-fung-the-bad-boy-of-the-stockmarket/

The interest article in this story is highlighted in red where a un-named senior official made a stupid statement " the locals are pushing hard, and anyone who raises questions or concerns is shouted down or lined up".

What a load of crap no one has been howled down nor have they been "lined up" this gutless senior official made this ludicrous statements that makes it look like Cairns has a rebellion on hand.

You want to make a statement then put your name to it or shut up.

It is everyone's democratic right to express an opinion.

tonyfung.developer.newsltd

Stakes high as mega-casino rolls into view

From The Weekend Australian, 5th April 2014

Not since the early days of the white-shoe brigade in Queensland – when developers waltzed in and out of the top offices of the Bjelke-Petersen government – has the talk been so big, the stakes so high.
An $8 billion Macau-style resort – with two casinos, eight hotel towers and a golf course – (is planned to lure) a million guests a year, from the gambling obsessed Chinese middle class and big-betting ‘whales’ from around the world.
The proposed Aquis Great Barrier Reef Resort in Yorkeys Knob, just north of Cairns, is promising to user in a new era of prosperity single-handedly for a tourist town struggling with the high dollar.
Easily the most expensive ‘non-resources project in Australia, the 240ha complex is proposed to be built on cane fields in the sleepy seaside suburb where a timber shack with a garage underneath is considered to be a high-rise. It seems Tony Fung – a Hong Kong businessman who last year burst out of nowhere with his plans for a mega-casino resort – has got almost everyone on side. Politicians are talking it up, businesses are making plans to expand and families are designing extensions to their homes to rent to the 9000 construction workers and 10,000 permanent staff if the casino gets the go-ahead. It has sparked a frenzy of support in Cairns, where a multitude of ills – sever acute respiratory syndrome, the global financial crisis, cyclones and lack of new investment – has depressed the local economy to the extent that it has the highest youth jobless rate (21.6 per cent) in Australia.
But lost in the excitement of a resort, and its projected annual take of $11bn, is growing division among the 3500 residents of Yorkeys Knob, one of the only residential beach suburbs in Cairns.
“We moved here to raise our families in a peaceful seaside community, and now we are going to be living beside the new Las Vegas,” Yorkeys Knob Residents Association president Pamela Bigelow said.
Ms Bigelow, who was appointed briefly on a “reference group” set up by Mr Fung, said she also doubted some of the promised benefits of the development.
“Publicly they have said that 10,000 staff will work in the casino, but when I asked them how many would be locals, I was told it would be limited,” she said.
“I was told that the front-of-house will be Chinese, and I guess the locals get to do the lawns and clean the toilets.”
Mr Fung’s son Justin, who is normally based in Cairns as Acquis chief executive, said in an interview from Hong Kong he could not give a breakdown on the proportion of local and flown-in staff.
“Obviously we will have a management team and we need Mandarin and Cantonese speakers… but we remain dedicated to improving the employment rate in Cairns,” Justin Fung said.
Bigelow’s group is pitted against the recently reformed and rebadged local business group – now known as Yorkeys Knob Community Progress Association – which admits to receiving “some funding” from the Fung family. While the groups fight it out, there is a real prospect that the proposal to build the resord on existing can fields – which sits on a flood plain criscrossed  by crocodile-infested creeks – will not win environmental approval.
James Cook University professor Jon Nott, of the Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Sciences, said the project would likely breach local planning rules.
“There is a reason nothing has been built in that area before,” Professor Nott said.
“The proposed development is located on the Barron River delta, which floods regularly and is also prone to storm surges from the ocean during tropical cyclones. They are proposing to raise the levels of the project, but it is based on outdated methodology.”
With the resort set back from the beachfront, and sealed off from the neighbouring waterways, Tony Fung had hoped to avoid a drawn-out approval process.
Labelled “the bad boy of the stockmarket” by the HK Economic Times, he has had a simple message for the Newman government since announcing his plans last year: approve the resort quickly or he will go somewhere else.
One senior official, involved in the assessment of the project, said that pressure to approve the resort quickly was intense, especially as the state government approaches an election, due early next year.
“It is a frenzy up here – people are desperate to get this thing happening,” he said.
“And it is not just Fung either – the locals are pushing hard, and anyone who raises questions or concerns is shouted down or lined up.”
Mr Fung has repeatedly warned that he will go to Japan, The Philippines or South Korea – where casino licenses are soon to go onto the open market – if he is made to wait too long.
“The window of opportunity that is available to us is limited… there are a lot of people going after a piece of the action and the competition for me is not Mr (James) Packer or Echo (Entertainment) but from other countries,” he said last year.
The son of one of Hong Kong’s most successful traders, Mr Fung – who had initially hoped to begin the four-year build in July – has been disappointed by the Newman government.
Last year, prompted both by his plan and a push by Mr Packer’s wish to build a casino resort in Brisbane, the Newman government called for bids for three “integrated casino resort development” licenses in Queensland.
Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney said yesterday: “The integrated resorts are the emerging product in the tourism market world-wide, and the casino license is just one part of that.
“They have enormous potential to inject life into any number of centres, like they have in Singapore and Dubai, and Cairns is just one spot.
“The resorts attract tourists and we have the comparative advantage of also having the drawcard of the reef, the rainforests and the beaches throughout Queensland.”
The host of natural attractions was the decider in wanting to build a casino for the booming Chinese middle class in Queensland, where Mr Fung began investing, in cattle stations and property, two decades ago.
“We are going after the people that are shy who, if they were asked where they are going for Chinese New Year, would say Macau and be called a gambler, but instead they can say Aquis Great Barrier Reef and be labelled a ‘family man’.
During the week, the government announced there were 12 bidders, who had put up the $100,000 application fee, with plans for resorts in Brisbane, the Gold Coast, Whitsunday region, Great Keppel Island and Fung’s proposal outside Cairns.
The decision last year to call for a competitive process is understood to have enraged Mr Fung, not least of all that it delayed the project’s earliest date that if can begin building by at least a year, to next May.
He sacked his local lobbyists – including former conservative premier Rob Borbidge – before rehiring him in the new year.
But he is unlikely to make good with his threat and pull up the surveyor’s pegs on the project anytime soon.
Mr Fung has a lot of skin in the game. He has now bought the Reef Casino Trust, which operators the existing Cairns casino, as well as the casion in Canberra for $269 million.
Justin Fung told The Weekend Australian that the family couldn’t comment on whether the existing casino licence would help in the push for approval for the bigger project.
“We look forward to operating both properties in Cairns,” Justin Fung said.
As to the growing concerns from residents about living next door to one of the biggest casinos in the world, he said there was enough space between the resort and people’s homes.
“We are doing our best to mitigate the issues,” he said.
“But there is a buffer zone, it is not as if someone in Yorkeys is going to hear the jackpot of a slot machine.”

List of Hong Kong people by net worth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is a Forbes list of Hong Kong billionaires is based on an annual assessment of wealth and assets compiled and published by Forbes magazine on January 8, 2014.

Failed Gold Coast Businessman working as a key consultan for Aquis

An article written on June 4 2014 has managed to be included in the Cairns Post today (July 17, 2014) a month and a half later.
It has been said Cairns is progressive but this has been kept quiet which is very unusual for any media outlet that reports on article like this.

Read on:
As reported in the Courier Mail Business section

Business City Beat: King gets back on the horse
ANTHONY MARX
THE COURIER MAIL
JUNE 04, 2014

Michael King
HAS failed Gold Coast businessman Michael King been secretly working behind the scenes as a key consultant on the proposed $8 billion Aquis mega-resort for Cairns?
City Beat spies report that King – who presided over the $2.5 billion collapse of the MFS tourism and finance group in 2008 – got involved through his association with Robert Bryett, a former Aquis executive.
Hong Kong billionaire Tony Fung, who has just scored a green light for his Aquis casino licence, is understood to have wanted to keep King’s role quiet.
No wonder. King is among five former executives at MFS (later renamed Octaviar) defending allegations of corporate wrongdoing brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. ASIC alleges the group misappropriated $147.5 million from its Premium Income Fund and reallocated the money through multiple entities in an effort to pay debts in late 2007 and early 2008. False and backdated documents were allegedly used to justify the transactions.
King and the others face fines of $200,000 per breach and bans on managing corporations if found guilty in the on-going trial, which started last year. Neither King nor an Aquis spokesman returned calls yesterday.
Read more:
Fungs reply:
As reported in The Cairns Post
Thursday July 17, 2014
Fungs back appointment od former MFS executive and Gold Coast businessman Michael King As Aquis project manager
THE Fung family has defended the employment of a fallen Gold Coast businessman as its Aquis project manager.
Michael King has been employed by Hong Kong billionaire Tony Fung as his project manager for the
Michael King
proposed $8.15 billion resort-casino at Yorkeys Knob.
Mr King is the co-founder of the MFS tourism and finance group, which collapsed in early 2008 owing about $2.5 billion.
The former Gold Coast lawyer is among five former executives at MFS (later renamed Octavian) defending allegations of corporate wrongdoing brought by the Australian ­Securities and Investments Commission.
Mr King, however, has disputed he was the top man with the power to control the company’s finances. The Supreme Court trial for the matter has been ongoing, to be heard again next month in Brisbane.
Mr King has represented Aquis twice this week at business forums, speaking about the benefits of the development to the Far North and the rest of the state.
Justin Fung
Mr Fung’s son Justin told the Cairns Post yesterday he stood by Mr King’s business dealings.
“Michael is a project manager who has helped us gain access to networks in Australia,’’ he said. “We’ve found him to be extremely effective and a good character.”
Yesterday’s forum, organised by the Cairns Chamber of Commerce and Advance Cairns, attracted about 150 representatives from the local business community.
The forum was hosted at the Reef Hotel Casino, which Mr Fung has proposed to take over. The acquisition is the subject of an Australian Competition and Consumer Com-mission review, following concerns that one person could control two casinos in one city.
Mr King told the forum, that for his employer, the Reef Casino takeover was about preparation and training for Aquis.
“Imagine opening up your business absolutely cold in five years’ time, without having any start-up, without having any training facility, without having any business development facility,’’ he said.
“Imagine that the capital you had invested in your new business was $4 billion and you had to start to get an adequate return ... from day one.
“The acquisition of Reef is about Mr Fung being in a position to train staff to develop appropriate service standards, to start to bring VIP customers to Cairns, to start to market the name of the brand in China and elsewhere ... to ensure when Aquis opens, it hits the ground running.”
Cairns Chamber of Commerce CEO Deb Hancock said Aquis would attract an entirely different demographic to Yorkeys Knob compared to the Reef Casino.
“When we’re looking at the scale of the beds, the minimum bets are going to be those that go on in Macau – this is the calibre of the operation we’re going to see at Aquis,’’ she said.
The forum also heard from Flanagan Consulting Group’s Pat Flanagan, who provided an in-depth rundown of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the development.
Mr Flanagan assured the gathering extra steps would be taken to protect resort guests from crocodiles and biting insects, which have been identified as major health hazards.
“The edges of the lake will be vertical, one – to stop any particularly gymnastic crocodiles leaping out of the place,’’ he said.

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

They'll talk to business people but not the residents.....WHY? Does money really talk

It is interesting to see that the developers and  Flanagan Consulting Group met with the real estate agents at a Real Estate Institute of Queensland  Forum on Tuesday July 15, 2014.

Mr king the Aquis representative was questioned as to whether Mr Fung had the financial capicity to build the Mega Resort.

I have poised this question before on this site but we haven't seen anything that would substantiate that funding was available.

Mr Fung as reported earlier travelled earlier to Hong Kong seeking the banks backing and also seeking investors but nothing has been said if that was a successful venture.

What we do have is a comment by Justion Fung as follows:

The Fung family had spoken to financial institutions about funding the resort and had not yet committed to any, he said.
You can read the article below dated June 7, 2014 under the heading:

Another day another story but will it ever eventuate.

So who do we believe? has the State government requested information on the funding? so that residents have sound information and understanding of this issue, what happens if the project starts then suddenly stops for unforseen reasons who is going to pay for the cleanup to put the area back to it's original state.

Here is a comment by a qualified project financier with over 30 years experience and poses this question:

With no joint venture investor parties, a hotel operator of international calibre nor an experienced casino operator there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Mr Fung has the financial capacity to deliver this massive $8bln project himself. So before spending huge amounts of public monies and time on evaluating the Aquis EIS why has the government not demanded Mr Fung provide assurance that if the EIS is approved, licence granted etc he has underwritten finance and can actually then deliver the project. This is usually standard practice for substantial projects such as this. Simply if Fung and this project is to be given any credibility as anything other than ‘pie in the sky’ we need to see a letter from lending agencies such as banks that they will make all monies available for the construction of Aquis if licences are granted.

Mr King made a statement at the meeting and is listed in red below then in blue he states that "we are very confident international capital markets will providing the funding necessary to complete Aquis.

That would mean no there is no financial backing for this venture at this time, why can't there be some truth in this story.

It's turning out to be another sage like "Days of our Lives" .... never ending.

Also an attempt was made to get Pat Flanagan out to Yorkeys to speak to the residents and explain what was happening with this project but his reply was "As I am under contact and cannot speak about this" but now they can speak at a forum with Real Estate business people.

Absolutely disgusting and a slap in the face for the local residents...MONEY DOES TALK.

Also keep in mind that the Federal Government had discussions with the Chinese Premier , in fact the Chinese were demanding that work visas be issued to Chinese workers so that they can work on Chinese projects in Australia, so where's all the work for the locals?.

Read more: http://m.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/free-trade-agreement-china-wants-to-send-workers-into-australia-20140415-zquve.html?skin=dumb-phone

Read the story from the Cairns Post...

Estate agents rally for Aquis housing while Fung reps confirm project has financial clout

DANIEL BATEMAN THE CAIRNS POST JULY 16, 2014 8:00AM

VISION: An artist's impression of the main entrance of the $8.15 billion Aquis Great Barrier Reef Resort at Yorkeys Knob.

HONG Kong billionaire Tony Fung’s representatives have declared he has the financial clout required to proceed with Aquis, if the mega-resort is approved.

It comes as real estate agents have been rallied together to help find accommodation to house thousands of construction workers associated with the $4.6 billion development.

The Real Estate Institute of Queensland hosted an industry forum yesterday on the proposed casino-resort, and the opportunities it presented for Far North businesses.

The project will comprise 7500 hotel rooms, a casino, shopping precinct and a convention centre.

The public consultation phase associated with the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Yorkeys Knob project started on June 21 and ends on August 5.

At the forum, attended by about 200 real estate agents and urban developers, Aquis representative Michael King was questioned whether Mr Fung had the financial capacity to fund the project.
Since Aquis was announced more than 12 months ago, it has faced opposition, with local groups questioning whether developers have the money.

Mr King told the forum his employer had so far spent more than $23 million on the project, including feasibility studies and the Environmental Impact Statement, and so far received zero return.

“As to the question of financial capacity – he’s playing a weird, strange game if he’s spending $23 million for the fun of it,’’ he said.

“He’s not.

“Having said that, every major casino project in the world is listed on the stock exchange ... there is no question that ultimately Aquis is headed for a stock exchange listing. When that will happen, though, is still up in the air.”

“We are very confident international capital markets will providing the funding necessary to complete Aquis,’’ he said.

Aquis is expected to generate 9300 jobs during its construction, rising to 10,000 jobs a year once operational.

REIQ acting CEO Antonia Mercorella said there were concerns about the project’s demand on housing, and impact on local businesses.

“We would anticipate the housing process would be driven up, the rental prices would be higher and inevitably that will have some impact on affordability,’’ she said.

“But there was some indication that some people may choose to live outside of the Cairns base, and perhaps a little bit further away.

“Still, it comes back to meeting that demand.

“We need to plan for it.

“And that was the call for action today.”

The project’s EIS states the cost of renting in the northern beaches is anticipated to increase as investor speculation increases and vacancy rates decline. The report also says owners will quickly command higher rental returns, placing pressure on those least able to absorb the increases.

It says some displacement of renters is expected to occur quickly, which may have flow-on effects for services providers who provide social and emergency housing services to lower social-economic sectors.

Flanagan Consulting Group director Pat Flanagan, speaking after the forum, said Cairns’ development industry would need to respond to the call for demand for housing associated with Aquis.
Mr Flanagan, whose firm carried out many of the EIS studies, said it was clear more housing stock was needed to supply this demand.

Sunday, July 13, 2014

The Aquis casino resort EIS community information Symposium.

The Aquis Casino symposium which was held on Thursday evening July 10, 2014 to present "portions" of the EIS report to the residents with expert speakers as Professor Jon Nott, Professor Alan Hale who outlined the information contained within the report.

Professor Nott was again frustrated by the lack of data contained within the report which would have assisted him and his team to check and test all the revelant information within the report.

The Professor outlined significant problems that could occur with the building of the Casino/Resort outlining that various areas could be affected by flooding and he did state that "Yorkeys Knob could flood then again it may not" and without that data no one is 100% positive.

One has to ask "WHERE DID FLANAGANS GET THEIR INFORMATION FROM?"  and more importantly why wasn't it in the EIS report and until it is presented we assume that the info "could" be fudged.

Consultants like Flanagans are only interested in satisfying their developers and keep info under wraps instead of making it public like they are required to do until the regulations.

All information pertaining to this project and others are required to be listed in EIS reports.

It was interesting to not that a representative from the Co-Ordinator General's office was in attendance and was taking notes of what was said especially by the speakers and what Professor Jon Nott had to say and he pulled no punches.

It was unfortunate that all relevant data was not available in the EIS report and had it been so then all in attendance would have better information explained to them, but like everything else like this the information was just not there for it to be tested. 

Professor Nott and his fellow colleagues did the best to present information to all in attendance.

Interesting comment by a Project Financier with over 35 years experience who travels the world and Australia dealing with large projects.... he had this to say...

With no joint venture investor parties, a hotel operator of international calibre nor an experienced casino operator there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Mr Fung has the financial capacity to deliver this massive $8bln project himself. So before spending huge amounts of public monies and time on evaluating the Aquis EIS why has the government not demanded Mr Fung provide assurance that if the EIS is approved, licence granted etc he has underwritten finance and can actually then deliver the project. This is usually standard practice for substantial projects such as this. Simply if Fung and this project is to be given any credibility as anything other than ‘pie in the sky’ we need to see a letter from lending agencies such as banks that they will make all monies available for the construction of Aquis if licences are granted.

This is a comment made earlier in an interview: 


The Fung family had spoken to financial institutions about funding the resort and had not yet committed to any, he said.
You can read the article below dated June 7, 2014 under the heading:

Another day another story but will it ever eventuate.

Money laundering ---- Do we really want this to happen here?

Money laundering is not new it happens all over the world and with it comes crime, prostitution and many other unsavoury things that eats into the community and that community can never return to it's original state in other words gone forever.

Aquis is a big concern as it will create bigger crime problems and with that comes growth in local crime such as home invasions, assaults, robberies etc including rapes along with many other activities that evolves around illicit crime.

The Government doesn't really care they will get their share of taxes which might pay off the state's debt and they have proved that they don't care by bypassing community consultation but on the other hand talking to people from the Chamber of Commerce (who have done nothing for the ordinary resident) tourism bodies etc.

Read this link and get a better idea of the problems that may await us:

http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/7/9/china/australias-siv-scheme-target-money-laundering


ACCC questions Aquis takeover of Reef Casino

Article copied from Cairnsbiz blogspot.
http://cairnsbiz.blogspot.com.au/

The ACCC has released a statement of issues on the Aquis takeover of Reef Casino and invited comments from interested parties: ACCC calls for comment on the Aquis proposed acquisition of Reef Hotel Casino

The components of the statement most relevant to key issues:

28. The ACCC’s preliminary view is that without the proposed acquisition the Reef Casino would be likely to continue to operate either under its current ownership or under the ownership of another non-Aquis operator. However the ACCC received submissions during the course of market inquiries suggesting that Cairns could not sustain two commercially viable casinos. As a result of this material, the ACCC is considering the likely impact of the Aquis Resort on the Reef Casino’s ongoing viability.

The ACCC invites comments from market participants on its preliminary view regarding the operation and viability of the Reef Casino if the proposed acquisition does not proceed. In commenting on these issues, market participants may wish to consider: 

1) The Reef Casino’s current financial circumstances 

2) The types of customers that visit the Reef Casino, or that would visit the Reef Casino in the future, and whether those customers would instead be likely to visit the Aquis Resort once it opened 

3) The population of Cairns, the expected number of tourists that would travel to Cairns in the future if the Aquis Resort were developed, and how many of those tourists would be likely to visit the Reef Casino. 

29. Before the Aquis Resort can be developed, it needs to obtain various regulatory approvals, including: 

a. A casino licence from the Queensland Government as part of its bid process 

b. Various probity and other regulatory approvals relating to the resort from the Queensland Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation 

c. Environmental approvals from state and federal governments 

d. Local planning approvals. 


30. The ACCC notes there is a degree of uncertainty inherent in the Aquis Resort proposal. The Aquis Resort would be of a scale that is unprecedented in Australia, and the viability of an ambitious project of this scale may be less certain than a smaller project would be. There is also some uncertainty as to whether wealthy Chinese patrons will visit the Aquis Resort in such numbers as Aquis hopes. 


31. Aquis has told the ACCC that the Aquis Resort will not be developed in the absence of the proposed acquisition, because: 

a. Aquis needs to obtain finance for its resort - the first phase of the first stage of the Aquis Resort is estimated to cost approximately $4 billion to construct. Aquis has told the ACCC that it is unlikely to be able to raise sufficient funds from debt and/or capital markets to construct the Aquis Resort in the absence of the proposed acquisition. 

b. Aquis needs to use the existing Reef Casino as a platform from which to develop its profile with its intended customers (predominantly international VIPs), and train its workforce, while the Aquis Resort is being constructed. 
 

32. The ACCC’s preliminary view, based on the information presently available, is that the Aquis Resort is likely to be developed (in the sense of being a realistic commercial proposition) with or without the proposed acquisition. In reaching this view, the ACCC has taken into account factors including that:

a. Aquis is investing significant funds in the proposed development and clearly intends to build it, subject to regulatory approvals being received on commercial terms. 

b. Aquis holds an option to acquire the land on which it plans to build the resort. 

c. As discussed above at paragraph 10, the Queensland Government has included the Aquis resort in a shortlist of two developments for the award of up to two casino licences as part of the Queensland Government bid process.

 
d. Aquis has commenced the process of seeking regulatory approvals – it has released an Environmental Impact Statement for public consultation.8 
 
33. The ACCC understands that the proposed acquisition may provide Aquis with certain advantages in developing the Aquis Resort. However, the ACCC’s preliminary view is that the proposed acquisition is not necessarily essential to Aquis obtaining finance for the development of the resort, or the successful promotion and opening of the resort. 

The ACCC invites comments from market participants on its preliminary view regarding the likelihood of the Aquis Resort being developed. In particular, market participants may wish to comment on: 

1) The likelihood of the Aquis Resort receiving a casino licence as a result of the Queensland Government bid process, and the conditions on which any licence may be issued 

2) Any commercial, legislative, economic, regulatory, demographic or other impediments to the Aquis Resort being developed 

3) Whether and how the proposed acquisition might affect the likelihood of the Aquis Resort being developed, including but not limited to:

a) Whether Aquis would be able to secure finance (through debt and/or capital markets) to develop the Aquis Resort if it did not acquire the Reef Casino 

b) Whether the Aquis Resort is likely to be commercially successful if it is not able to make use of the Reef Casino to help develop an international profile and experienced workforce while the Aquis Resort is being constructed. 


If anything the ACCC have also provided there more information than has been released so far on the risks, viability and financing of Aquis? Reef Casino Trust is ex distribution this week and trading down on small volume today.

Monday, July 7, 2014

Casinos bid has ACCC on alert

The Australian Consumer Watchdog has launched an inquiry into the the Hong  Kong business man Tony
Tony Fung
Fung in relation for his bid for two casinos in Cairns.
The ACCC has stated that:

" that they are concerned about Hong Kong billionaire Tony Fung’s bid to own two casinos in Cairns. 
Mr Fung made a $269 million bid to buy the Reef Hotel Casino in Cairns, as well as Canberra’s casino, and build the $8.15 billion Aquis six-star mega-casino resort 15km north of the CBD at Yorkeys Knob. 
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says it is worried about one person owning two casinos in one city. 

“The proposed acquisition has the potential to reduce the number of casino owners in Cairns from two to one, removing potential competition between the Reef Casino and the Aquis Resort,” ACCC Commissioner Jill Walker said in a statement.
“The ACCC is concerned that the proposed acquisition has the potential to deprive customers of the benefits of competition between these casinos; such as promotions, rebates, or reductions in the price or improvements in the quality of other goods or services provided in conjunction with casino table games.”
The ACCC has released a Statement of Issues seeking further information on the competition issues which have arisen from its review to date and is available on the public register.
“The ACCC will continue to investigate the extent of expected competition between the Reef Casino and the Aquis Resort in the absence of the proposed acquisition. We will also look at competition between these casinos and other local venues with gaming machines,” Ms Walker said.
An Aquis spokesman said the Fung family would make further submissions to the ACCC before a July 17 deadline. “We remain confident that the ACCC will approve the transaction,’’ he said.
Aquis is one of two regional integrated resort developments short-listed by the Queensland government.
The development is in the pre-planning phase and must obtain several approvals before building can begin after next year’s wet season".

Then on July 5, 2014 a senior company director attacked the ACCC for the scrutiny of the proposed takeover of the Cairns Reef Casino.
ATTACK: Keith DeLacy has attacked
 the Australian Competition and Consumer
 Commission’s scrutiny of the proposed
 $269 million takeover of the Reef Hotel Casino.
The director in question is Keith Delacey who is a former treasurer in the past Queensland Government admits that he is a Director of the Cairns Reef Casino and hold 5ooo shares within the Ref Casino.

It would be common sense to anyone especially those holding a Director's position and having 5000 shares that they would welcome the inquiry to clear the way for the purchase so one would question the outcry by Mr De Lacey.
Why do you question the inquiry Mr De Lacey?
The ACCC is there to protect all.



Read the full story: http://www.cairnspost.com.au/business/scrutiny-of-accc-over-reef-hotel-casino-in-cairns/story-fnjpusdv-1226978487381

We await the outcome of this inquiry.

Saturday, July 5, 2014

QUEENSLAND VOICES CONCERN OVER TONY FUNG’S PURCHASE OF RIVAL REEF CASINO

JULY 3, 2014

Casino News

Kirby Garlitos.

Commission has expressed concern that Chinesebillionaire Tony Fung‘s purchase of the Reef Casino Trust would shut down any form of competition between the casino and Fung’s proposed$7.5m Aquis development, leaving customers with a lack of options should they decide to go to Cairns and the Great Barrier Reef for a little gambling action.

Fung’s purchase of the competition also flies against the state government’s mission of creating more employment opportunities and stimulating the economy. There would still be local venues with gambling machines, but only the naive would deem them healthy competition to the massive Aquis resort, which is slated to have as many as 750 gambling tables and 1,500 machines and Reef Casino, which has 38 gambling tables and over 500 machines.
A separate $7 billion bid by ASF Consortium, the Broadwater Marine project, is the only other applicant to come this far in Queensland’s approval process, but it’s not viewed as a direct competitor to Aquis because, well, Cairns is a long ways away from Brisbane (almost three hours by plane and 20 hours by car). So without the Reef Casino holding court as a direct competitor to Aquis in Cairns, Fung’s massive project would effectively have a monopoly in the northern part of Queensland.
ACCC chairman Rod Sims told the Wall Street Journal that an investigation on how Aquis plans to use the Reef Casino will continue. For its part, Aquis has said that it would respond to the concerns raised by the ACCC and is confident that the sale will ultimately be allowed.

Is this person for real?

This person posted this comment on the Cairns Post Face Book page.
I cannot believe someone could write such trivia without reading all information available and also googling on the web.

Pauline Stirgess
10/15/2013
We should be getting down on our knees to THANK THE DEVELOPERS of AQUIS for offering this wonderful opportunity to Yorkeys Knob, Cairns, FNQ and indeed the whole of Australia - we will ALL benefit!


Are you for real?

Friday, July 4, 2014

EIS community information Symposium


Aquis Aware Coalition of Concerned Citizens  (AACCC) and  Yorkeys Knob Residents Association (YKRA) will present
The Aquis casino resort EIS community information Symposium.
Chaired by Pamela Bigelow President of YKRA and Member of AACCC

A panel of experts will address social, economic, and environmental impacts as described in the recently released EIS.
The symposium will assist you to understand and respond to the 4000 page document that assesses the impacts of  the largest integrated casino resort development to be built in Australia.
Where: Crowther Lecture Theatres JCU Smithfield
When: Thursday 10th July At: 7.00 – 9.30 pm

Please RSVP to attend this event via the link below
http://aquisaware.org/eisinfo/

Please forward this message to your contacts.
Copyright © 2014 Aquisaware.org, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to our mailing list via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Aquisaware.org
Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Cairns, QLD 4870
Australia

Thursday, July 3, 2014

ACCC calls for comment on Aquis' proposed acquisition of the Reef Hotel Casino

3 July 2014
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has released a Statement of Issues outlining potential competition concerns with the proposed acquisition by Aquis Reef Holdings (Aus) Pty Ltd (together with its related bodies corporate, Aquis) of the Reef Hotel Casino (Reef Casino) in Cairns.
Aquis is a privately held company ultimately wholly owned by Mr Tony Fung, a Hong Kong resident private investor.
Aquis currently has no existing casino interests in Australia, but proposes to develop a large resort, including a casino, at Yorkey’s Knob, 15km north of Cairns (the Aquis Resort). If it is developed, the Aquis Resort will be the second casino in Cairns. In a related transaction, Aquis is also proposing to acquire the Casino Canberra from one of the main unitholders in the Reef Casino Trust.
The proposed acquisition is of all the units in the ASX-listed Reef Casino Trust (RCT) and all of the issued shares in Reef Corporate Services Limited and Casinos Austria International (Cairns) Pty Ltd (the responsible entity of the Reef Casino Trust and manager of the casino respectively).
“The proposed acquisition has the potential to reduce the number of casino owners in Cairns from two to one, removing potential competition between the Reef Casino and the Aquis Resort,” ACCC Commissioner Jill Walker said.
“The ACCC is concerned that the proposed acquisition has the potential to deprive customers of the benefits of competition between these casinos; such as promotions, rebates, or reductions in the price or improvements in the quality of other goods or services provided in conjunction with casino table games.”
The Statement of Issues seeks further information on the competition issues which have arisen from the ACCC's review to date and is available on the public register.
“The ACCC will continue to investigate the extent of expected competition between the Reef Casino and the Aquis Resort in the absence of the proposed acquisition. We will also look at competition between these casinos and other local venues with gaming machines,” Ms Walker said.
The ACCC invites further submissions from interested parties in response to the Statement of Issues by 17 July 2014. The ACCC's proposed final decision date is 21 August 2014.
The Aquis Resort is currently one of two proposals shortlisted by the Queensland Government for the award of up to two casino licences as part of regional integrated resort developments. As part of this process, the Aquis Resort has sought approval for approximately 750 gaming tables and 1500 gaming machines. If it proceeds, the resort will also include nine hotels, high-end retail shopping, an aquarium, two theatres and convention and exhibition facilities.
The Queensland Government expects to make a final decision on whether the Aquis Resort will receive a casino licence in 2015.
The Reef Casino is a combination hotel and casino complex in Cairns, Queensland. It has 128 hotel rooms, 38 gaming tables and over 500 gaming machines.
The statement of issues is available on the public register.
Release number: 
NR 171/14
Media enquiries: 
Media team - 1300 138 917

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

After waiting 6 months the EIS has arrived..... so what does it really tell us?

After 6 months of waiting the EIS has finally been released, in over 4,000 pages and only six weeks to read and try to comprehend the contents.

The period of reading should be at least 2 - 3 months as most people work and can only read the contents at night so the pollies need to consider extending the perusal time, however this won't happen because they are so hell bent on getting this mega structure up and going and stuff you all.

The 3 local politicians and the Cairns Post have NOT listed any unforseen risks that may occur with the building of this mega structure, their main concern is get it up and going and that in it's self is a real concern as I have said in previous articles.

Many questions still need to be asked such as:

(1). With no joint venture investor parties, a hotel operator of international calibre nor an experienced casino operator there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Mr Fung has
the financial capacity to deliver this massive $8bln project himself. So before spending huge amounts of public monies and time on evaluating the Aquis EIS why has the government not demanded Mr Fung provide assurance that if the EIS is approved, licence granted etc he has underwritten finance and can actually then deliver the project. This is usually standard practice for substantial projects such as this. Simply if Fung and this project is to be given any credibility as anything other than ‘pie in the sky’ we need to see a letter from lending agencies such as banks that they will make all monies available for the construction of Aquis if licences are granted.

(2). interesting to note the Mr Fung senior is the only shareholder.

As per  2. PROJECT PROPONENT

2.1 PROPONENT DETAILS

Name:Aquis Resort at The Great Barrier Reef Pty Ltd
ACN: 160204384
ABN: 95160204384
Postal Address: P.O. Box 419 Westcourt Qld 4870
Directors and Representatives details:
Mr Tony Fung Chairman /Sole Shareholder
Mr Justin Fung Director and Chairman of Australian Operations

(3). has Tony Fung ever owned or managed or operated a casino or resort?

(4). how many "mega structures" has Flanagan's been involved with, we are talking about a $8.5 billion project probably the largest casino/resort ever to built in the world and using solely a small design architects business for this project, one would think that more would be involved but apparently not.

This comment doesn't take away any capabilities of the Flanagan consulting business.

(5). the project was supposedly to be designed by AEDAS as stated by Justin Fung, AEDAS are a well known company that specialises in large projects like Aquis yet it would appear that Flanagan's is doing most if not all the work.

Designed by Aedas, the mega resort – to be completed by 2018 – is planned to include nine luxury hotels, villas, a stadium, high-end retail shopping, theatres, a golf course and one of the world’s largest aquariums – all set by a giant 65-hectare lake.

Full story can be read by clicking on this link:

This is a world-wide architectural firm that designed the Venetian Sands casino in Macao.